![]() ![]() ![]() This course must be taken as CS 4300, not as INFO 4300, to be used for the CS 4000+ electives category. For example, CS 4300 is cross-listed with INFO 4300. Courses used for the CS 4000+ electives category must be taken under the CS rubric.Other substitutions for required CS courses require field approval. Some substitutions are allowed, e.g., CS 3420/ECE 3140 for CS 3410.Choose distributions and advisor-approved elective courses accordingly. Courses at the 3000+ level used for the External Specialization or Technical Electives usually have prerequisites.CS Core courses and the CS 4000+ electives and project must be taken at Cornell.Apart from the exceptions just given, no course can be used to satisfy two or more requirements.For example, ENGRD 2640 may be used to satisfy the distribution requirement and the technical communications requirement, or MATH 4710 may count as a technical elective and satisfy the probability requirement. A course satisfying the technical communications or probability requirement may also be used to satisfy another requirement.Here are some comments with respect to the requirements for the CS major in the College of Engineering: But organizations, such as independent pharmacies, that have historically been spared the burdens of HIPAA enforcement are now being investigated for the same chronic non-compliance as the rest of the health care industry.įinding a HIPAA solution that caters to the needs of health care organizations in today’s market has become more important than ever before, which is why implementing a HIPAA compliance software is one of the best ways to mitigate exposure to this growing area of national risk.To affiliate with the Computer Science major, refer to the page: Becoming a CS Major. Large-scale investigations are still going to rank high among OCR’s priorities. What the Cornell settlement proves, more than anything, is that HIPAA enforcement is changing its face. OCR Director Jocelyn Samuels commented on the settlement, saying that: “Regardless of size, organizations cannot abandon protected health information or dispose of it in dumpsters or other containers that are accessible by the public or other unauthorized persons.” She continued, “Even in our increasingly electronic world, it is critical that policies and procedures be in place for secure disposal of patient information, whether that information is in electronic form or on paper.” Independent pharmacies and small-scale franchises had not yet been subject to major settlements, and the industry continued to operate under the federal regulation without serious scrutiny. Prior to Cornell, settlements with large retail pharmacy chains such as CVS and Rite Aid had been highly publicized. Additionally, the investigators uncovered that Cornell had failed to implement any written policies or procedures, leading to serious violations of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. ![]() OCR discovered that the information in question was unsecured, not shredded, and contained personally identifiable information. The investigation began when OCR received notice from a Denver news outlet, which claimed that documents containing the protected health information (PHI) of some 1,610 patients had been improperly disposed of on Cornell’s premises. The $125,000 settlement was announced on Apin response to OCR’s findings over the course of its investigation. The InvestigationĬornell Prescription Pharmacy was a small, single-location pharmacy based out of Denver, Colorado. This case proved landmark in the history of HIPAA enforcement because of OCR’s decision to investigate such a small-scale data breach on the national level. On April 27, 2015, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) handed down a $125,000 settlement to a small, single-location pharmacy based out of Denver, Colorado called Cornell Prescription Pharmacy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |